<div dir="ltr">Boa tarde lista, <div><br></div><div>estou montando uma interconexão entre 2 asterisk em IAX. Como o asterisk usado é o 1.4.44, estou usando o dahdi para timing. Gerei testes de timing com dahdi_test nas duas maquinas... </div>
<div><br></div><div>A primeira maquina "parece" estar aceitável...</div><div><div>Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy...</div><div><br></div><div>8192 samples in 8159.920 system clock sample intervals (99.608%)</div>
<div>8192 samples in 8159.167 system clock sample intervals (99.599%)</div><div>8192 samples in 8239.496 system clock sample intervals (99.420%)</div><div>8192 samples in 8159.472 system clock sample intervals (99.603%)</div>
<div>8192 samples in 8239.479 system clock sample intervals (99.420%)</div><div>8192 samples in 8159.504 system clock sample intervals (99.603%)</div><div>8192 samples in 8159.496 system clock sample intervals (99.603%)</div>
<div>8192 samples in 8239.496 system clock sample intervals (99.420%)</div></div><div><br></div><div>A segunda parece estar bem ruim...</div><div><div>Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy...</div><div><br></div>
<div>8192 samples in 7999.944 system clock sample intervals (97.656%)</div><div>8192 samples in 7999.568 system clock sample intervals (97.651%)</div><div>8192 samples in 7999.864 system clock sample intervals (97.655%)</div>
<div>8192 samples in 7999.896 system clock sample intervals (97.655%)</div><div>8192 samples in 8002.944 system clock sample intervals (97.692%)</div><div>8192 samples in 15999.663 system clock sample intervals (4.692%)</div>
<div>8192 samples in 15999.792 system clock sample intervals (4.690%)</div><div>8192 samples in 11997.663 system clock sample intervals (53.544%)</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>O que pode ser feito para melhorar o timing? Existe alguma detalhe que preciso observar?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Att,</div><div>Ricardo Landim</div><div><br></div></div>